tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2439200743774853734.post4991861343917976307..comments2009-02-18T09:33:44.003+08:00Chi-Changhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13468838767406254164noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2439200743774853734.post-75720448392502899412009-02-18T09:33:00.000+08:002009-02-18T09:33:00.000+08:00Dear collateral damage,<BR/><BR/>That's exactly the point - SMIs need the help, not the big companies which are still expecting 20% profit growth and employ majority foreigners. <BR/><BR/>Who benefits most from this cheap electricity? The SMIs or the big companies? Better to spend OUR RM3.5bn on deserving SMIs rather than spread it all around, with the undeserving also getting help.<BR/><BR/>Cheers,<BR/><BR/>Chi-ChangChi-Changhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13468838767406254164noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2439200743774853734.post-92053419633999264662009-02-17T11:39:00.000+08:002009-02-17T11:39:00.000+08:00Don't just look at the big companies. That is the problem with analysts. Look at the SMIs. As I have said previously, a reduction in power would be a godsent. <BR/><BR/>- Collateral Damage -Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2439200743774853734.post-17908784001494655432009-02-14T09:56:00.000+08:002009-02-14T09:56:00.000+08:00Aiyah, I beg to differ with your opinion.<BR/><BR/>Rather keeping 3.5 bn with Petronas (which will ultimately be used by BN), it is better to spread it out...even crumbs is better than nothing.<BR/><BR/>Of course, the 3.5bn can be better allocated (the Q: will BN do it???).Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2439200743774853734.post-32538349479702294322009-02-13T15:57:00.000+08:002009-02-13T15:57:00.000+08:00Thank you for your analysis. I agree with you that the reduction is not the best way forward.<BR/><BR/>I like your idea in providing subsidy to energy intensive companies.These are more long term benefitsChrishttp://www.chrisleong.netnoreply@blogger.com